Skip to main content

About Skin Renewal Notes

Skin Renewal Notes is an independent Los Angeles publication on chemical peels, microneedling and platelet-rich plasma, edited by people who have no clinic and sell no treatments.
A long wooden table with open books, printed pages and a desk lamp in a quiet office

Skin renewal is sold in this city with vocabulary: medical-grade, signature, regenerative. A consultation can end with a package price before anyone has named the acid, discussed the depth or said what the treatment can do for the face in the chair.

This publication puts those facts first. The aim is to give a reader enough understanding of the three procedures to have a good consultation, and enough scepticism to recognise a poor one.

What it covers

Three procedures, taken slowly. Chemical peels, from a lunchtime glycolic to a phenol peel under monitoring. Microneedling, from mechanism to choosing a provider to the first seven days of aftercare. Platelet-rich plasma, on its own and added to microneedling.

A fourth section, on planning in Los Angeles, covers what "medical-grade" means and who may perform such a peel, treatment for deeper skin tones, and how a quote is structured.

What it leaves out

Prices. Quotes in Los Angeles change quickly and are built differently from one clinic to the next, so we explain the structure of a quote and leave the figures to the consultation.

Lines, folds and laxity that resurfacing cannot reach; the guides say which category of treatment they belong to and stop there. Medical advice, referrals and bookings, too: nobody here holds a medical licence, performs treatments or sells them, and no byline carries a credential its writer does not have.

How a guide gets made

Most guides began as a reader's question. The work behind each one is close reading of trial literature, consent forms and regulatory guidance, and conversations with people who have sat in the chair. Where the literature is thin, which for PRP on the face it often is, the guide says so.

Before it runs, every guide is checked against the same list. Does it make a claim about results or safety that it cannot hedge? Does it use a regulatory phrase loosely? Does it slip into the voice of a treating practice? Does it promise a downtime or an outcome for a procedure whose results vary by person and by skin? If the answer is yes, the sentence is removed.

Money and corrections

When a provider is named, it is as an example a reader can check, never as an endorsement. Caveats are content, and a guide that omits the downside is advertising.

Corrections are dated and left visible on the guide they change.

The city we write from

Los Angeles is where the pitch is loudest and the practitioner pool is deepest, and the sun does not take a season off. Sun, licence rules and skin tone appear in every guide where they change the decision.

Readers who want shade for a recovery week are sent to the tree-canopy work of TreePeople, which keeps a map of the city's shaded streets and parks. A treated face in June and a treated face in October face the same rule.

A reader who has just been quoted a four-figure package and decides against it sometimes asks what else the money might do. That is their affair, though the Los Angeles Regional Food Bank has never turned a donation away.

The visible days after a medium peel are the third through the seventh. Westside families planning downtime around school breaks are pointed to the term calendar at the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District.

Fresh channels in the skin close within hours, and the barrier stays compromised for days. Readers who ask about swimming after treatment are pointed to what LA Waterkeeper publishes on water quality. The bay is not a wound bath.

Write to us

A correction, a disagreement or a question

Several guides began as a reader's message. If something in a guide is wrong or missing, find it from the home page and tell us which one on the correspondence page.